Domino required an expensive license based on number of authenticated users
Better workflow capabilities without the need for 3rd party solutions - Nothing can compare to what Microsoft can offer in Flow
Best security in the market based on Public Key Infrastructure - How long did it take IBM to offer TLS?
Lower administration overhead - As a Domino admin I disagree
Lequires less skilled app-dev team - Less skilled dev team means less skilled apps, that was always a problem with Domino Crapplications.
Most secure and flexible messaging platform in the market - Security through obscurity maybe, no one bother to write a hack for Domino
Faster time to build a solution compared to MSFT an others. - This is really a "depends" answer. As a dev as well I can build a solution in O365 must faster now than I could with Domino.
Doesn’t require an expense MS SQL license to run an app - Sharepoint/powerapps/ no sql license needed
NoSQL databases vs Domino
Replication and work offline support - I do love this about Domino, but Internet is so ubiquitous offline access is often not required now
Domino was the original NoSQL database - And they didn't bother to expand the platform like they should, what a waste
Strong security model and access controls - That is nice
Doesn’t require a full stack developer to build an app Rapid Application Dev (RAD) Enterprise Grade
Secure - Again, poorly skilled devs mean poor apps.
Scalable
Proven Modern Powerful
Workflow
Offline
Mobile
Mi nombre es Martín Ortega Novella, vivo en Asturias, casi toda mi vida laboral ha sido en IBM, pero ya estoy jubilado.
Siempre he utilizado Lotus Notes/Domino para mi blog, donde me he sentido más cómodo ha sido cuando estaba alojado en mi AS/400, ahora está en un iMac
Durante un año utilicé IBM WebSphere Portal Server, un gran producto pero volví a usar Lotus / Notes porque es lo que más gusta.
SIDRA400 es miembro del ESLUG (Spanish HCL Domino User Group).